Statistics glossary
Terms from experimentation, causal inference and marketing measurement, defined properly. Each one gets its own page: what it means, the formula, a worked example, and the misreadings that cost people money.
Most statistics glossaries define a term using four other terms you also do not know. These do not. Every entry opens with a definition you can read out loud in one breath, then explains the same idea again at length, shows the arithmetic on real numbers, and finishes with the specific ways the term gets misused — because in practice the damage is almost never done by people who have never heard of a p-value. It is done by people who have heard of one and think it is the probability the result is a fluke.
The terms are grouped by the job you are doing rather than by statistical family, and each group is a page of its own. If you are running an experiment and something looks wrong, start with experimentation — sample ratio mismatch is the first thing to rule out. If you are trying to read a result somebody handed you, start with inference: p-value, confidence interval and statistical power between them explain most of what a results table is claiming.
If the question is whether your marketing actually caused anything, that is causal inference and modelling — incrementality, geo experiments and marketing mix modelling are the three tools most companies end up choosing between, and the entries say plainly what each one can and cannot tell you.
Where a term has a calculator, the entry links to it, so you can go from the definition to a number without leaving the site. We build measurement systems for a living — see our A/B testing work or the case studies — and this is the vocabulary those projects run on.
Frequently asked questions
Who is this glossary for?
How is each entry structured?
Why are the formulas written without LaTeX?
A term I need is not here. Can you add it?
Can I link to or quote these definitions?
Knowing the words is not the same as knowing the answer.
Most measurement problems are not vocabulary problems. They are a metric that moves for the wrong reason, a test that never had the power to detect what you were looking for, or three channels each claiming the same conversion. If any of that sounds familiar, talk to us.
